1. People who believe that her daughterI'm more impartial than Ms Farrow so I'd actually describe the groups as:
Dylan ElizaMalone was sexually abused by Mia's ex-partner Woody Allen,
2. People who are monsters.
1. People who believeBut I also believe there is at least one other faction:
Dylan ElizaMalone was sexually abused by Woody Allen, or
2. People who do not believe [I'm gonna stick with Malone since that's the name she uses professionally and on social media] Malone was sexually abused by Woody Allen.
3. People who are really uncomfortable tossing aside the legal principle of "innocent until proven guilty" and/or averse to swift-boating a victim of abuse.I'm in this latter group.
This doesn't mean I'm a rape apologist.
This doesn't make me Woody Allen's stooge.
This doesn't mean I found Malone's New York Times' column less interesting than Robert B. Weide's Daily Beast post. Both were compelling.
It simply means that I'm uncomfortable voicing an opinion on a decades-old news story that is so muddled and convoluted it makes my head spin. I don't have an opinion about it. I should NOT have an opinion about it. None of us should. The American judicial system is flawed, to be sure. But in this instance I'm more than happy to throw my hands up in the air, announce "No charges were filed against Allen? Fair enough. I'm good with that! But all the same I do not want to watch his movies!" and carry on.
Quite frankly I'm much more interested in the different names that the various Farrow/Allen children have adopted thru the years. Ronan = Satchel = Seamus. Malone = Eliza = Dylan. Moses = Mischa (I'm not sure about that one, actually). What does it mean that Malone reverted to 'Dylan' for the purposes of the NYT article? Same thing with the Vanity Fair article in 2013 (the one where Farrow dropped the bomb about having an affair with Sinatra).
And as I promised...
Just a reminder, everyone: Ronan Farrow's new show debuts February 24 on MSNBC! And Woody Allen is nominated for an Oscar!
(And let's not pretend that the re-interest in this situation is not being driven by either of these events.)